Nothing reveals weaknesses quite like a full-on cyber-attack. For precisely that reason, smart organizations conduct penetration testing. A penetration test simulates an actual attack but under controlled conditions. This allows the cyber security team to proactively address vulnerabilities before hackers can exploit them.
Penetration testing offers several key benefits. In the first place, it provides a clear picture of the company’s security stance from the perspective of a motivated attacker. Testers not only identify vulnerabilities but also determine the level of risk involved. Using this information, the organization can prioritize risk and develop an effective cyber security plan.
A successful breach can cost millions of dollars, and the longer the hacker lives in the system, the more damage they can do. Finding and remediating security flaws before an attack occurs saves money, reduces downtime, preserves the company’s reputation, informs strategy, and supports compliance and privacy initiatives.
A typical penetration test includes five phases:
Additionally, testers may comb through publicly available information such as social media accounts, company websites and other public domains.
During this phase, the testers will work to cover their tracks, just as a malicious attacker would do. This may involve disabling security controls, clearing logs, and otherwise making it difficult for security personnel to detect their presence.
Security providers may offer different types of penetration testing, depending on the type of organization and business needs. Each type of testing has different methods and objectives. For instance, in an external penetration test the ethical hacker attempts to breach security through external-facing technology such as websites or external servers.
An internal penetration test, on the other hand, involves the tester attempting to cause damage using the organization’s internal network. This delivers visibility into the types of damage an unhappy employee or a hacker with stolen credentials could cause.
Additional types of tests include attacks through social engineering or IoT devices. Some organizations will commission a red team attack. Through a multi-layered attack simulation, this test measures the effectiveness of network and application security, human security awareness and physical security all at once.
Penetration testing done five years ago will have little benefit now. Organizations should conduct penetration testing on a regular basis. Testing should occur at least annually. Additionally, any important change should trigger testing. This could include infrastructure or application upgrades, new offices or significant changes to assets and services.
Responsible security providers take great care to protect their customers during penetration testing. This means carefully controlling the testing environment with multiple safety measures in place. For instance, testers should work with the organization prior to conducting the test to determine any activities and devices that should be excluded from the testing process.
eMazzanti consultants have conducted thousands of penetration tests using an advanced penetration testing framework combined with our expert manual penetration methodology. By using both automated scanning and manual testing, we replicate the attacker mindset and highlight more weaknesses.
Using the results of the penetration testing we will assist your organization with choosing and implementing security strategies specifically designed to optimize investment and provide the best protection.
Cyber threats never take a day off, never clock out and go home at the…
Building, deploying, and managing applications via Microsoft's global network of data centers is easier with…
Microsoft Copilot is a tool, powered by AI, that aims to boost your productivity within…
Making things happen is the art and science of project management. The process involves managing…
In today's fast digital life, website performance is important, as it holds visitors and ensures…
The FBI reported that cyber attacks against government facilities saw an increase of almost 36…